Wed 7 Jan 2009
Where have all the Tree Cowboys gone?
Posted by admin under informational, natural tales
No Comments
I was on my way to see my papou (grandfather in Greek), and for some reason I kept it on KCRW, listening to a broadcast of Santa Monica’s Council meeting. The meeting was about the Tree Crisis that had the whole town in a dispute over what to do with the dying Ficus the city of Santa Monica had planned to cut down due to fungi infections, general decay, old age, etc.
The citizens of Santa Monica gave their voices, opinions and suggested what to do in timed statements that made some relative sense. They spoke about the shade and architectural beauty that these massive trees provided. One guy who couldn’t string two words together kept talking about Wind power. His slurred words suggested he might have been experiencing a flashback. Another member of the community reputed that these trees drew tourists to Santa Monica in the first place. Funny, I always thought it was the beach and the promenade that attracted tourists. Being a frequent visitor to the beach community, I don’t think of the beautiful canopies along the boulevards when I think of Santa Monica. But at the very least, the broadcast interested me enough to check out what was going on.
While the City of Los Angeles planned on planting 1,000,000 trees, as initiated by Mayor Villaraigosa, the City of Santa Monica planned on cutting down some of its old trees. “The Public Landscape Division of the Community Maintenance Department will be removing the following Indian Laurel Fig (Ficus microcarpa ‘Nitida’) trees …These trees will not tolerate the amount of root pruning necessary to continue performing the City wide sidewalk and curb repair program” (Issued by City of Santa Monica).
The Santa Monica city council also claimed that because some of the Ficus trees had contracted a fungus that was rotting them to the core, they needed to be removed immediately. If not, then all sorts of public health concerns and liabilities come into play if branches start falling out of no where, killing cars and people on the way down to hit the ground. Makes sense. Who wants to deal with that kind of bullshit? Isn’t that why they have the phrase “nip it in the bud”? And, Coupled with the trees nature for it’s roots to split up concrete, “according to According to the city, removing the 54 trees would make streets safer for pedestrians and reduce concrete sidewalk-repair costs and legal payouts to trip-and-fall victims.
Really? The city is more concerned with people getting a scraped knew beucase they weren’t looking where they were going and might fall! This is more important to worry about than the homeless in the city or the cleanliness of their beach water? A possible scraped knee? Then you know what they should do? Post a fucking bandaid dispenser! And a “Watch where you’re going” or “Mind the roots” sign somewhere!It would be much more cost effective then the hundreds and thousands of tax payers money they spent on destroying these trees.
I mean, those big Blue buses must kill all sorts of pedestrians every year and they’re still allowed on the streets. It’s understandable to empathize with Hippies: all that global warming scare, epidemic fears and the fact that we need to save all the trees we can. But why did the council wait this long, until it became a problem to do something about it? Why didn’t the SM Park and recreation Dept. notify the city earlier? Was there was no effort to help nurse the sick trees before giving them their death sentence.
If you had an ailing grandpa who was losing his faculties slowly, and you knew it was only going to get way worse, would you pull the plug on the guy? So, what to do, what to do? I know! Let’s launch an attack against these forest haters! Let’s form an organization and call it “Treesavers,” have a blog, rally the community, let our voices be heard, hold tree vigils, stage/threaten hunger strikes, chain ourselves to the trunks of these trees. Let’s try to pass them off as historical landmarks or something (LAist.com). Let’s cause a scene!
“The city wants to remove over 50 of the beautiful, large-canopy Ficus trees and replaced with small Ginkgos that though beautiful, actually cast very little shade (most of it after 20 years’ growth). Why? The city claims some of them are too damaged to be saved. But the majority of these trees are being removed to make those streets more attractive to the shopping public. This weird logic flies in the face of research, surveys and studies showing that dense, large-canopy trees attract shoppers. They make the place nicer, better and healthier for everyone.” – Treesavers.blogspot.com
It turns out actually, as reported by the LA Weekly earlier this year, the real reason to remove the ficus trees was apart of a $8 million project that will revitalize 2nd and 4th street storefront curb appeal. In fact the a business owners association claims that the reason why retail stores on Third Street are doing so well, despite this economy, is beucase “the Promenade is planted with a more flowery tree species.”
Ummm…I don’t think it’s the trees that are the problem as much as it is the crappy stores that just happen to be there…What do Ficus trees have to so with that?
For a while, the Treesavers were out there fighting the good fight for the trees and going forward with their crusade to preserve nature in Santa Monica. They even had some of the store owners support the cause by having posters in their display cases. One storeowner says Ken Salek, who co-owns Nobel Gems Inc. with his brother said, “I’ve been here for 25 years. We chose this street because of the look that these trees created. Fourth Street is known for these trees.”
But unfortunately, it became a showdown. The battle between green and evil came to a halt when the Treesavers were blind sighted by 23 trees being felled overnight, taking the members by complete surprise. The city officials cut down the trees in the early morning.
So what’s become of them? Where have these mighty tree defenders gone? After basically being bitch slapped by the city, you’d think there would be some sort of public outrage. Or that they had some guerilla-esque tactics up their sleeves. A Plan-B!
But no, they’re as quiet as a tree. Maybe, they’re laying on the down low, gathering resources and planning a massive citywide attack. Perhaps, congregating some street teams and plotting against certain people in positions of power, so when the time comes they’ll at last take their vengeance.
As of now, their blog is still up, trees are still coming down, and no new strikes are in the works. Except for a daily vigil. Or is that just a ruse to the unsuspecting?

